Interesting site which can help you with free advertising for your business site or your personal site, whichever you need more traffic to.
(in case of advertising your site for free, you need just to become a Gold member, just refer Hits2 U to 3 other friends).
That's Hits2U! Working for you!
.com domains don't have a thing on .WS domains, especially if you want to combine a word like Windows, Rainbows, News, Dews, Laws between your name or business or desired word with the WS suffix itself.
They are more than a domain site, they're a business site. You won't be disappointed if you aspire to have a website everyone would be impressed by.
Please check it out here...
In light of the sentencing to 7 years of the former football pro, Luke McCormick(25 years old), in Britain yesterday, I think it's time to stop drinking and driving before it happens through the following:
- If there are guards at the pubs, then they should be stopping those who have been drinking inside and were about to leave the pub in their bike or in their car.
- Think Casinos. They have a strict security overseeing cheaters r excessive, abusive behaviour by some. If that same policy would apply to controlling the drunks, even those who had even 1 full glass of wine, beer or stronger before they left the pubs and the likes, ther would be no drink and drive accidents.
I think it's about time to start a new kind of policing, a smart one, surreptitious one, a decisive one taking the side of life, rather than letting the police itself worry about the aftermath of such incidents!
Wondering what's all the rage about network type marketing, so I am willing to give it a go this coming week. Thing is I started with one, while curious about a second marketing opportunity.
So, it might be interesting and full of profit at the same time, because I could use a financial boost. Multi level marketing is actually the step by step (friend to friend based) solution, so they say.
If the product is good, the solution would be great for me and for the client.
So I will come back in a couple of days and type about what company is it and how I or you could be profiting from it.
Good deeds are nice, but if not planted in the right spot, they may crumble to dust. Just like the good thoughts of ending poverty. I saw a movie the other day about an African man who just got a better job, but when he wanted to buy something, they asked more money of him. Even if you earn a little, the people notice you earn a lot.
The movie was very poorly done, but effective enough, and it just shows how not much changes after centuries in some countries. If someone would actually go build a building in a poor neighborhood, people would come to live there, if the price is right, of course.
So, next time you think about ending poverty in countries less developed, I think it's time to act beyond governments or charities and go build a building, rather then send money or end deficits of budgets.
If you can plant a tree, what good is a tree if someone lives near it? If you'd build a building, someone would live there, and the tree would not be a thorn that everyone surrounds it. Trees live forever, people do not!
Every country has a pre-selection program, but the rest of Europe does not hear potential songs which could have left a greater impression in the competition itself. Therefor, each and every show from all participant countries should be heard and seen throughout the continent.
There can be a national vote to select which song should represent each country, as well as a pan-European vote, thus taking into consideration what others would think about the local songs, this resulting in 2 songs advancing through to the competition proper.
The, so called, block-voting nations, like former Soviet states, Scandinavian nations and former Yugoslav countries should all be in one group when the competition's semi-finals are due, as well as in the final itself, therefor allowing only 1 (possibly 2, at the most) country to qualify for that final day of the event.
This format is based on European or World cup events, where 2 nations from a group of 4 countries (in preliminaries there might even be 6 nations) would qualify for the final. This would eliminate any obvious vote regardless of the song or performance of the respective country. The voting for this format should be submitted by the populations of the participant countries within the group only. In the final, all Europe can vote for the songs qualified.
This group stages could have various draws throughout the years, ensuring a level participation field from various nations, notwithstanding the block of countries in the end. This should make the competition more interesting, as the public would await with anticipation the pairing of nations.
Furthermore, each nation used to perform their songs in their native language, with few exceptions. These days, the exceptions should become excerpts in the format of a ticker which would come with every performance, as the singer would sing in their native language, while the subtitles would give us an idea of the song.
The live orchestra has disappeared throughout the years, and, although it might be expensive as well as time-consuming for some nations, remember the fact that it took only a conductor to come in and direct the orchestra itself, it didn't take any big musicians to come in and play from every country. Live playing is that more exciting than a playback, is it not?
The jury format for the competition should make a comeback in this way: before the European votes are to be cast, an analysis of the songs, voices and performances should be allowed, thus giving everyone a clue about what they are voting, who they are voting for with respects to all performers and singers, as well as point out true potentials, stumbles or which lyrics are to be given a greater mention.
The jury, made up of professional composers, singing coaches and past Eurovision participants, should also cast their vote. Together with the pan-european vote (50%) and the jury vote (50%) the winning song would be chosen.
The Eurovision has lost its charm, yet with this new format it would greatly improve its quality, because there's more to music than just voting, there are singers to consider for everyone, there are languages to be heard, there are cultures to be seen and be inspired by.
Glad Eurovision hype is finally over! In the end the greatest song of the competition has won. It was more than deserving, although the Russian entry had to pull out the big gun... Evgeny Plushenko. the performance was simple, he had his half moon shaped skating space there, while Dima Bilan was singing (or performing the song, sort of say). Dima does have a nice voice and he song won over other acts like Ukraine and Greece.
Eurovision has sure changed a lot these past 10 years. UK finished last of the qualified countries, although had 14 points accredited to it. The bias neighborly voting was there for all to see, even new countries like Azerbidjan gave Turkey (the only country they possibly have related to) the 12 points, as Andorra has granted 12 to Spain. Scandinavian countries helped themselves, but only Norway (who had my favorite song in it) finished in the top 5 which is impressive.
With Eurovision gone, Roland Garros is next! Expect a strong performance from the Serbian armada, Ana and Novak will be vying for the finals in the clay court tennis tournament.